Assessment
~/appetizer-labs/platform-maturity-scorecard

Platform maturity scorecard

Certified maturity levelTen areas with four levels each, from "it depends on people" to "it is built in". You end up with a level per area, an overall reading and the next step for the three weakest areas.

~/appetizer-labs/platform-maturity-scorecard/limits

Not an audit, not a certificate

This scorecard is a self-assessment, not an examination. It does not know your code, your cluster or your organization — it only knows what you are about to click. There is no grade here, no certificate and no comparison with other companies: we have never measured where "others" stand, so we are not going to claim it. What you get back is an ordered version of your own judgement.

Expect one effect: self-assessments almost always come out kinder than measurements, and a visible ladder makes that worse. When you are torn between two statements, take the lower one. It gets more useful still if two people answer independently and you talk about where they disagree.

Your answers stay in the browser. They are not stored, not transmitted and not evaluated — not even anonymously. What reaches our reach measurement is that the scorecard was displayed, started and completed. Which level you picked, we never find out.

~/appetizer-labs/platform-maturity-scorecard/method

How the number is arrived at

The arithmetic is disclosed and deliberately plain. Each area offers four statements arranged as a ladder: the first is worth zero points, the last three. Ten areas therefore run from zero to thirty. The overall reading is your average level, rounded down — which is why the thresholds sit exactly at ten, twenty and thirty points. Nothing is weighted: a weighting would be a claim about which area costs more, and we have no data behind one. The three lowest areas are the ones discussed in detail; a tie keeps the area listed first. Areas already at the top level never appear there.

The four levels

  1. Level 0Ad hocIt works when the right people are around.
  2. Level 1RepeatableThere is a way to do it, but it needs constant attention.
  3. Level 2EstablishedThe way is set up, written down and followed.
  4. Level 3Built inIt is a property of the system, not an effort by individuals.

Assessment review steps

Every area belongs to a review step of the Platform Bottleneck Assessment — the short form of what is examined there over days, against your own data.

~/appetizer-labs/platform-maturity-scorecard/areas

Ten areas

For each area pick the statement closest to your everyday reality — not the one you are aiming for. Answer for the area you are responsible for, and for a normal day.

01Review step: Delivery-flow reviewPath to productionHow a finished change gets shipped, and how much of that is done by hand.
02Review step: Stakeholder interviewsPlatform ownershipWho owns the shared infrastructure, develops it, and decides when there is doubt.
03Review step: Stakeholder interviewsSelf-serviceHow a team gets an environment, a database, a namespace or an access grant.
04Review step: Risk and dependency mapSecurityWhen security shows up: as a gate at the end, or as a property of the path.
05Review step: Delivery-flow reviewObservabilityWhat you know about a running system without asking anyone.
06Review step: Architecture reviewCost managementWho can explain the bill, and who can do something about it.
07Review step: Architecture reviewDeveloper experienceHow much friction sits between an idea and a change that runs.
08Review step: Risk and dependency mapReliabilityWhat happens when something fails, and what happens to it afterwards.
09Review step: Stakeholder interviewsGovernanceHow technical decisions get made, and how long they hold.
10Review step: Stakeholder interviewsTeam capabilityHow much knowledge sits with individuals, and how new knowledge reaches the team.

What makes sense after this

If you want to know whether your reading holds, the Platform Bottleneck Assessment is the next step. It covers the same areas — but against your pipelines, your cluster, your incidents and your cloud bill rather than a set of choices in a browser. Fixed scope, a written result, prioritized quick wins and a roadmap. If you would rather carry on alone, the services and workshops per area are linked above — that is a legitimate outcome of this page.

10
~/appetizer-labs/platform-assessment

Profile in hand — now what?

The assessment page states what gets examined, what you have to provide, what you receive and who it is not meant for. If you would rather talk first: the fit check is a short call in which "this is not worth it for you" is one of the possible answers.

Reader settings

Font size